The Republicans 'insure' a war against Islam in the Middle East as part of the policial agenda by including in their specific verbiage of terror the description of a terrorist as an Islamic Terrorist.
"Giuliani saved his sharpest jabs for Democrats. (click here) "In four debates, not a single Democrat said the word, 'Islamic terrorists.' Now that is taking political correctness to extreme," he said.
They are incorrect, not from the perspective of political correctness, but, from the perspective of wide spread fear and hatred of Muslims. Mr. Giuliani likes to practice bigotry to stigmatize and 'unknown' commodity in the Middle East. Every year Saudi Arabia issues an 'most wanted list' among it's populous. This example is 2005 (click here).
List of 36 most-wanted terrorist suspects
On June 28, 2005, the Ministry of Interior issued a new list of 36 suspects who are most wanted by the security forces in connection with acts of terrorism.
Of the 26 on the most-wanted list issued on December 6, 2003, 23 are known to have been killed or are under arrest....
The point is there are huge numbers of innocent people killed and currently suffering in Iraq. The numbers are so large that if the current people 'under seige' don't receive relief from neighboring countries and the ceasation of American occupation, there could be a slide into a massive genocide. The Republicans don't even recognize the civilian deaths they have caused and the suffering they continue to cause.
The illegal invasion and continued occupation of Iraq has been the 'direct result' in their deaths and suffering. That cannot be disputed. Somehow that gets translated by the Republican seeking presidential nominees as 'necessary' in the face of a grossly failed USA strategy. The danger in all this, including the Guiliani verbiage is a continued scapegoat of Muslims in the Middle East.
This is a reference from Wikipedia and while some would debate the 'validity' of this source, it is a source that 'keeps up' with current trends and facts. The definition of Islamist Terrorist states clearly from the USA Counterterrorism Center of the USA that not all terrorists are Islamists.
"...According to statistics (click here) gathered by the National Counterterrorism Center of the United States, Islamic extremism was responsible for approximately 57% of terrorist fatalities and 61% of woundings in 2004 and early 2005, where a terrorist perpetrator could be specified. [1] Extremist acts have included airline hijacking, beheading, kidnapping, assassination, roadside bombing, suicide bombing, and occasionally rape.[2][3]
This 'bigotry' uttered by minimally Giuliani of the Republican Party has direct intent to instill false fear of Muslims. That is extremely dangerous as the Republican agenda of the illegal invasion into Iraq since March 2003 has failed. The current 'trends' Bush states are a swing of success with 'the surge' are claimed on the tails of populous depletion of Iraq as millions have gone into refugee status and the dead continue to escalate in the face of the USA occupation which is stated by Bush to be necessary to stop the deaths. Bush's statements are complete contradiction in terms. Iraq is best left to the region. The longer the USA remains in Iraq the greater the casualities will become and the real chance the current trends toward genocide will become an actuality masked by the propaganda of the USA media to the people of the USA as the elections of 2008.
Mr. Giuliani has demanded a return to 'the culture of fear' experienced by Americans in previous election rhetoric with complete abandon to the facts, the realization that the USA Counterterrorism Center doesn't even use the verbiage Islamic Terrorist, the current warring that does exist is a civil war and not a USA National Security mission or the fact there is escalating hardship of the Iraqi population. That escalating hardship brings to reality the fact a full one third of the populous there doesn't possess the physical strength in the face of poverty and famine to carry out an act of war.
The people that seek to further victimize the people of Iraq, including the media. in the face of ALL facts are serving to escalate a genocide and NOT the national security of the USA. Dead people cannot attack the USA and to realize was never a threat to the USA is outrageous in the face of the suffereing of that people.
In all honesty, when realized there is a full one third of Iraqis in profound poverty that threatens their ability to sustain life; any rhetoric and I do mean any, currently of the Giuliani campaign and the Republican Party in general is perposterous and only raises more and more speculation to the intent of these political figures.
Iraq is NOT the 'central front' of terror. It is a country in chaos and remaining so under the leadership and occupation of the USA. I am sincerely concerned for the 'hatred level' of the Republican rhetoric which demands an escalation of war in Iraq without a plan to 'exit.'
The focus of the Republican political rhetoric needs to be far, far less rhetorical while addressing not just Iraq but all aspects concerned by Americans including their economy, trade deficit, Darfur, failing infrastructure causing the loss of American lives all the way back to Katrina, the poor state of American healthcare, the national deficit and the list just continues to grow. When an entire political party grows it's hopes for election on an unjustified and illegal war there needs to be sincere concern for such agendas.
"Giuliani saved his sharpest jabs for Democrats. (click here) "In four debates, not a single Democrat said the word, 'Islamic terrorists.' Now that is taking political correctness to extreme," he said.
They are incorrect, not from the perspective of political correctness, but, from the perspective of wide spread fear and hatred of Muslims. Mr. Giuliani likes to practice bigotry to stigmatize and 'unknown' commodity in the Middle East. Every year Saudi Arabia issues an 'most wanted list' among it's populous. This example is 2005 (click here).
List of 36 most-wanted terrorist suspects
On June 28, 2005, the Ministry of Interior issued a new list of 36 suspects who are most wanted by the security forces in connection with acts of terrorism.
Of the 26 on the most-wanted list issued on December 6, 2003, 23 are known to have been killed or are under arrest....
The point is there are huge numbers of innocent people killed and currently suffering in Iraq. The numbers are so large that if the current people 'under seige' don't receive relief from neighboring countries and the ceasation of American occupation, there could be a slide into a massive genocide. The Republicans don't even recognize the civilian deaths they have caused and the suffering they continue to cause.
The illegal invasion and continued occupation of Iraq has been the 'direct result' in their deaths and suffering. That cannot be disputed. Somehow that gets translated by the Republican seeking presidential nominees as 'necessary' in the face of a grossly failed USA strategy. The danger in all this, including the Guiliani verbiage is a continued scapegoat of Muslims in the Middle East.
This is a reference from Wikipedia and while some would debate the 'validity' of this source, it is a source that 'keeps up' with current trends and facts. The definition of Islamist Terrorist states clearly from the USA Counterterrorism Center of the USA that not all terrorists are Islamists.
"...According to statistics (click here) gathered by the National Counterterrorism Center of the United States, Islamic extremism was responsible for approximately 57% of terrorist fatalities and 61% of woundings in 2004 and early 2005, where a terrorist perpetrator could be specified. [1] Extremist acts have included airline hijacking, beheading, kidnapping, assassination, roadside bombing, suicide bombing, and occasionally rape.[2][3]
This 'bigotry' uttered by minimally Giuliani of the Republican Party has direct intent to instill false fear of Muslims. That is extremely dangerous as the Republican agenda of the illegal invasion into Iraq since March 2003 has failed. The current 'trends' Bush states are a swing of success with 'the surge' are claimed on the tails of populous depletion of Iraq as millions have gone into refugee status and the dead continue to escalate in the face of the USA occupation which is stated by Bush to be necessary to stop the deaths. Bush's statements are complete contradiction in terms. Iraq is best left to the region. The longer the USA remains in Iraq the greater the casualities will become and the real chance the current trends toward genocide will become an actuality masked by the propaganda of the USA media to the people of the USA as the elections of 2008.
Mr. Giuliani has demanded a return to 'the culture of fear' experienced by Americans in previous election rhetoric with complete abandon to the facts, the realization that the USA Counterterrorism Center doesn't even use the verbiage Islamic Terrorist, the current warring that does exist is a civil war and not a USA National Security mission or the fact there is escalating hardship of the Iraqi population. That escalating hardship brings to reality the fact a full one third of the populous there doesn't possess the physical strength in the face of poverty and famine to carry out an act of war.
The people that seek to further victimize the people of Iraq, including the media. in the face of ALL facts are serving to escalate a genocide and NOT the national security of the USA. Dead people cannot attack the USA and to realize was never a threat to the USA is outrageous in the face of the suffereing of that people.
In all honesty, when realized there is a full one third of Iraqis in profound poverty that threatens their ability to sustain life; any rhetoric and I do mean any, currently of the Giuliani campaign and the Republican Party in general is perposterous and only raises more and more speculation to the intent of these political figures.
Iraq is NOT the 'central front' of terror. It is a country in chaos and remaining so under the leadership and occupation of the USA. I am sincerely concerned for the 'hatred level' of the Republican rhetoric which demands an escalation of war in Iraq without a plan to 'exit.'
The focus of the Republican political rhetoric needs to be far, far less rhetorical while addressing not just Iraq but all aspects concerned by Americans including their economy, trade deficit, Darfur, failing infrastructure causing the loss of American lives all the way back to Katrina, the poor state of American healthcare, the national deficit and the list just continues to grow. When an entire political party grows it's hopes for election on an unjustified and illegal war there needs to be sincere concern for such agendas.
posted by The Revolt and Revolting at 9:49 AM
<< Home