CNN is creating an exclusive 'place' for the word "God" as connected to extremism.
"God's Soldiers"
"Anvil of God"
These are 'presentations' CNN considers 'specials.' They seek to reward Neocons in their belief that people are 'chosen' to make moral dictates a matter of government in the USA and especially dangerous in a military capacity.
They are regularly using the 'word' God (as noted below) to instill hope where there is actually none. Hence, when the bad news comes, rather than blaming their government for failures in infrastruture they will seek solice in a 'godly intent.' It is a passifier for the populous of the USA seeking to find it.
'Only the Lord knows' if miners are still alive (click this title)
The title shows on the CNN main e-page. It is from a quote of by a CEO of the company.
..."I don't know whether these miners are alive or dead, only the Lord knows that," said Robert Murray, CEO of Murray Energy, the parent company of the mine's operator....
To use the words God/Lord to the people at the scene is to allow an image of a CEO directly connected to his faith, but, with little knowledge of the working conditions of his employees. It is a PR strategy being used AGAINST the families and citizens affected by this mine collapse. This entire mess in broadcasting using 'God/Lord' in titles, context is an attack on people to seek 'religious correctness' and secure a viewership that is primarily wealthy enough to use 'cable news' services. There was a time when anyone could afford cable services, now it's a matter of spending preference and content.
God/Lord has become a marketing tool to these networks. It is a form of religious bigotry and victimizes people not involved with such extremism. Very few in the USA connect the bungled war in the Middle East with devine purpose. Those that do have been lied to and mislead. This plays out in election results for politicians that use the attack of strategy against people. God, to these people and CEOs, is a survival mechanism when faced with having to supply 'real answers' to real problems.
This is not responsible journalism, which is supposed to point to such corruption as this. Yes, using religious overtones to war, lost infrastructure, contaminated food supplies and political dogma is corruption with intent to 'control loyality' of citizens. It's the worst form of corruption. It's manipulative and dangerous.
CNN doesn't balance any of this extremism with 'the truth' regarding the contnued destruction by the USA miltary in Iraq while their commander and chief continues to lie about the fact Iraq is a war whtere al Qaeda exists. It's all a lie and news networkds such as CNN and FOX seek viewership through exploitation of the focus of a despeate administration. An example of a very scary reality is noted in the case of Colonel Michael Steele whom built his presence in Iraq on the pretense the war was to defeat the people that attacked the USA on September 11, 2001. By displacing the 'reason for war,' by the USA which is supposed to be in defense of the country, onto 'any' country, all invasions are possible. What has occurred in the case of Colonel Michael Steele clearly demonstrates the adverse effects of liesby the Executive Branch. Colonel Steele justified his very aggressive techniques in Iraq as a way of 'instilling in soldiers' the will to fight. It worked but 'in that' they only killed innocent civilians, never one insurgent and it can be easily extrapolated that Colonel Steele was responsible for the beginnings of Iraq's insurgenty, turned rebellion, tuned civil war.
When FOX and CNN reward these lies and false promises they are more the problem than the problem itself. They do not reflect the reality. Arguably, they may not have that cognitive capacity within that corrupt corporate structure.
"God's Soldiers"
"Anvil of God"
These are 'presentations' CNN considers 'specials.' They seek to reward Neocons in their belief that people are 'chosen' to make moral dictates a matter of government in the USA and especially dangerous in a military capacity.
They are regularly using the 'word' God (as noted below) to instill hope where there is actually none. Hence, when the bad news comes, rather than blaming their government for failures in infrastruture they will seek solice in a 'godly intent.' It is a passifier for the populous of the USA seeking to find it.
'Only the Lord knows' if miners are still alive (click this title)
The title shows on the CNN main e-page. It is from a quote of by a CEO of the company.
..."I don't know whether these miners are alive or dead, only the Lord knows that," said Robert Murray, CEO of Murray Energy, the parent company of the mine's operator....
To use the words God/Lord to the people at the scene is to allow an image of a CEO directly connected to his faith, but, with little knowledge of the working conditions of his employees. It is a PR strategy being used AGAINST the families and citizens affected by this mine collapse. This entire mess in broadcasting using 'God/Lord' in titles, context is an attack on people to seek 'religious correctness' and secure a viewership that is primarily wealthy enough to use 'cable news' services. There was a time when anyone could afford cable services, now it's a matter of spending preference and content.
God/Lord has become a marketing tool to these networks. It is a form of religious bigotry and victimizes people not involved with such extremism. Very few in the USA connect the bungled war in the Middle East with devine purpose. Those that do have been lied to and mislead. This plays out in election results for politicians that use the attack of strategy against people. God, to these people and CEOs, is a survival mechanism when faced with having to supply 'real answers' to real problems.
This is not responsible journalism, which is supposed to point to such corruption as this. Yes, using religious overtones to war, lost infrastructure, contaminated food supplies and political dogma is corruption with intent to 'control loyality' of citizens. It's the worst form of corruption. It's manipulative and dangerous.
CNN doesn't balance any of this extremism with 'the truth' regarding the contnued destruction by the USA miltary in Iraq while their commander and chief continues to lie about the fact Iraq is a war whtere al Qaeda exists. It's all a lie and news networkds such as CNN and FOX seek viewership through exploitation of the focus of a despeate administration. An example of a very scary reality is noted in the case of Colonel Michael Steele whom built his presence in Iraq on the pretense the war was to defeat the people that attacked the USA on September 11, 2001. By displacing the 'reason for war,' by the USA which is supposed to be in defense of the country, onto 'any' country, all invasions are possible. What has occurred in the case of Colonel Michael Steele clearly demonstrates the adverse effects of liesby the Executive Branch. Colonel Steele justified his very aggressive techniques in Iraq as a way of 'instilling in soldiers' the will to fight. It worked but 'in that' they only killed innocent civilians, never one insurgent and it can be easily extrapolated that Colonel Steele was responsible for the beginnings of Iraq's insurgenty, turned rebellion, tuned civil war.
When FOX and CNN reward these lies and false promises they are more the problem than the problem itself. They do not reflect the reality. Arguably, they may not have that cognitive capacity within that corrupt corporate structure.
<< Home