Not to be overlooked:
CNN's conscience awakening takes form as a female anchor in Soledad O'Brien and the subject, 'Dedication to Mine Tragedy.'
Admirable.
It's good to know they are willing to seek issues of importance over the rhetorical warring causing huge issues with other countries. I do mean huge. I'll crosslink that reality in a few moments.
This is the crosslink (click here). The chronic 'war chant' of Bush has to come to an end. It has no basis in truth and does not serve the best interest of any other country except the USA's war machine. I realize a nuclear Iran is not a realistic idea for the Middle East to tolerate, but, the people of Iran are well educated people that can be summoned to a rational solution. The fact President Ahmadinejad was elected at all resulted 'directly' from fear of the expansion of the Iraq War. Iran's nuclear capacity must be dismantled, but, then that is a belief of Russia as well as the USA and the countries of the Middle East.
As a side note "To the Sensationalization' strategy of CNN: Oh, they just had to 'throw in' a UNSUBSTANTIATED report from an al Qaeda website by Deborah Feyerick. That is the problem with these 'sensationalized' news services. They 'interject all kinds of reason for fear when no real threat exists in the 'real world.' It does nothing to add to the credibility of their reporting. When this junk occurs it's laughable for as many times as they 'Cry Wolf.' It's also very expensive to cities that have to react and quell the concerns of citizens. I am sure the mayors are doing all they can to 'act' on these threats and protect their citizens. That's their job after all. Maybe CNN doesn't believe in the competency of Michael Bloomberg, huh? That is indeed CNN's problem and not mine.
US diplomacy with Iran is working (click here)
By Kaveh L Afrasiabi
Whereas the United States' new diplomatic approach toward Iran has already yielded tangible results, in light of Iran's enhanced cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the US-Iran dialogue on Iraq's security, the opponents of this approach in the US and Israel are nonetheless upping the ante against Iran, pushing for a military confrontation with the Islamic Republic, which is bound to have disastrous consequences for regional stability and global peace.
Led by such conservatives as William Kristol, the editor of The Weekly Standard, and the policymakers clustered around Vice President Dick Cheney, the "get tough on Iran" advocates have based their argument on the premise that the diplomatic approach championed by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has not had any results in checking Iran's nuclear and regional "ambitions" and must therefore be regarded as a "failure".
The Rhetorical Neocon Network uses 'terroristic threats' as a means to propagate support for their profiteers by unsubstantiated claims as noted below.
On one hand this anonymously authored article states there IS INDEED a Russian Crackdown while on the other hand holds ridicule of the same initiative. I do believe the IAEA, whom has not to date lied about Iran, is the authority that can validate advances toward dismantling the threat, while all this propagandized rhetoric simply fuels 'an electorate of untrust' of their own government unless it promises to destroy populous other than them. That focus alone is genocide and not even prudent to consider. It is well known any military engagement, nuclear or otherwise could destroy all Earth's populous many times over. This propagandized rhetoric has to stop.
Russian Crackdown On Iran Nuke Project A Ruse To Delay Military Action Against Iran Iclick here)
2007-08-09 -- USA Religious News
WASH— Russia, according to European and U.S. diplomatic sources, says it is not going to deliver further nuclear fuel rods to Iran’s Bushehr nuclear plant until the Iranian government lifts its veil of secrecy surrounding its nuclear program. The move, however, appears to be a ruse as other sources report that Russia has already delivered the initial fuel rods and is just trying to pressure Iran not to enter into an agreement on a Turkish gas pipeline that would cut into Russia’s monopoly over the gas routes from Central Asia to Europe. Russian President Vladimir Putin also is calculating that if he appears tough on Iran that the U.S. will back off sanctions or military action on Iran, further protecting Russian investment there.
CNN's conscience awakening takes form as a female anchor in Soledad O'Brien and the subject, 'Dedication to Mine Tragedy.'
Admirable.
It's good to know they are willing to seek issues of importance over the rhetorical warring causing huge issues with other countries. I do mean huge. I'll crosslink that reality in a few moments.
This is the crosslink (click here). The chronic 'war chant' of Bush has to come to an end. It has no basis in truth and does not serve the best interest of any other country except the USA's war machine. I realize a nuclear Iran is not a realistic idea for the Middle East to tolerate, but, the people of Iran are well educated people that can be summoned to a rational solution. The fact President Ahmadinejad was elected at all resulted 'directly' from fear of the expansion of the Iraq War. Iran's nuclear capacity must be dismantled, but, then that is a belief of Russia as well as the USA and the countries of the Middle East.
As a side note "To the Sensationalization' strategy of CNN: Oh, they just had to 'throw in' a UNSUBSTANTIATED report from an al Qaeda website by Deborah Feyerick. That is the problem with these 'sensationalized' news services. They 'interject all kinds of reason for fear when no real threat exists in the 'real world.' It does nothing to add to the credibility of their reporting. When this junk occurs it's laughable for as many times as they 'Cry Wolf.' It's also very expensive to cities that have to react and quell the concerns of citizens. I am sure the mayors are doing all they can to 'act' on these threats and protect their citizens. That's their job after all. Maybe CNN doesn't believe in the competency of Michael Bloomberg, huh? That is indeed CNN's problem and not mine.
US diplomacy with Iran is working (click here)
By Kaveh L Afrasiabi
Whereas the United States' new diplomatic approach toward Iran has already yielded tangible results, in light of Iran's enhanced cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the US-Iran dialogue on Iraq's security, the opponents of this approach in the US and Israel are nonetheless upping the ante against Iran, pushing for a military confrontation with the Islamic Republic, which is bound to have disastrous consequences for regional stability and global peace.
Led by such conservatives as William Kristol, the editor of The Weekly Standard, and the policymakers clustered around Vice President Dick Cheney, the "get tough on Iran" advocates have based their argument on the premise that the diplomatic approach championed by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has not had any results in checking Iran's nuclear and regional "ambitions" and must therefore be regarded as a "failure".
The Rhetorical Neocon Network uses 'terroristic threats' as a means to propagate support for their profiteers by unsubstantiated claims as noted below.
On one hand this anonymously authored article states there IS INDEED a Russian Crackdown while on the other hand holds ridicule of the same initiative. I do believe the IAEA, whom has not to date lied about Iran, is the authority that can validate advances toward dismantling the threat, while all this propagandized rhetoric simply fuels 'an electorate of untrust' of their own government unless it promises to destroy populous other than them. That focus alone is genocide and not even prudent to consider. It is well known any military engagement, nuclear or otherwise could destroy all Earth's populous many times over. This propagandized rhetoric has to stop.
Russian Crackdown On Iran Nuke Project A Ruse To Delay Military Action Against Iran Iclick here)
2007-08-09 -- USA Religious News
WASH— Russia, according to European and U.S. diplomatic sources, says it is not going to deliver further nuclear fuel rods to Iran’s Bushehr nuclear plant until the Iranian government lifts its veil of secrecy surrounding its nuclear program. The move, however, appears to be a ruse as other sources report that Russia has already delivered the initial fuel rods and is just trying to pressure Iran not to enter into an agreement on a Turkish gas pipeline that would cut into Russia’s monopoly over the gas routes from Central Asia to Europe. Russian President Vladimir Putin also is calculating that if he appears tough on Iran that the U.S. will back off sanctions or military action on Iran, further protecting Russian investment there.
posted by The Revolt and Revolting at 10:15 PM
<< Home